Purpose
The CSI Reference is intended to be a durable, independently verifiable scholarly resource. It documents the current conceptual architecture of Collective-State Inference while making clear which claims derive from established literature, which are interpretive syntheses, and which originate within the CSI research program.
Claim classification
- Established scholarship: claims supported directly by peer-reviewed research, scholarly books, standards, or authoritative technical sources.
- CSI synthesis: integrative interpretations that connect established literatures into the CSI framework.
- CSI proposition: original theoretical claims that require future empirical evaluation.
- Illustrative example: explanatory scenarios that clarify a concept but are not empirical findings.
- Empirical finding: claims supported by reported data and identified as such.
Citation standard
Consequential theoretical, methodological, historical, and empirical claims should include a nearby citation. Each cited source must have a complete bibliographic record with a DOI, publisher page, or other stable identifier when one is available. Citations must support the specific sentence or passage to which they are attached; topical proximity is not sufficient.
Source selection
Priority is given to peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books from established academic presses, conference proceedings with formal review, standards, and primary technical documentation. Review articles may orient a topic, but foundational or disputed claims should be checked against primary sources. Sources are selected for evidentiary relevance rather than prestige alone.
Verification
Bibliographic details, identifiers, and claim-source relationships are checked before publication. Where sources disagree, the Reference should represent the disagreement rather than imply false consensus. Claims that cannot yet be verified are narrowed, labeled as propositions, or removed.
Versioning and corrections
Substantive changes to definitions, construct boundaries, evidence standards, citations, or interpretations are recorded in the Version History. Typographical and formatting corrections may be grouped as editorial changes. Confirmed errors are corrected promptly without silently rewriting the scholarly record.
Research status
Reference articles may be manuscript aligned without being peer reviewed or empirically validated. Article metadata identifies the current status. Publication on this site does not by itself establish scholarly acceptance.
Generative AI assistance
Generative AI may support conceptual stress-testing, structural organization, language refinement, and iterative critique. The author remains responsible for verifying claims, references, interpretations, and final wording. AI-generated text is not treated as a scholarly source, and AI systems are not used as independent evidence for factual or theoretical claims.
Authorship and independence
The CSI Reference is maintained by Edward D. Clark as an independent researcher. Editorial responsibility, source selection, theoretical interpretation, and corrections remain with the author unless an article explicitly identifies additional contributors or reviewers.
Questions and corrections
Questions about sourcing, interpretation, or possible errors may be sent to ed@collectivestateinference.org. Correction requests should identify the page, passage, and supporting evidence.